|
Death Penalty Proven Ineffective on Many Levels
There are many reasons the death penalty should
be abolished. It is a complex issue and it is difficult to point to any
single fact or argument as the most important. Below are a number of
extremely valid reasons that the state of California should stop the
practice of capital punishment.
Capital punishment does not deter crime.
Scientific studies have consistently failed to demonstrate that
executions deter people from committing crime. The respected Thorsten
Sellin studies of the United States in 1962, 1967 and 1980 concluded
that the death penalty was not a deterrent.
The USA is unable to prevent accidental
execution of innocent people.
Studies show that in this century, at least 400 innocent people have
been convicted of capital crimes they did not commit. Of those 400, 23
were executed. The wrongful execution of an innocent person is an
injustice that can never be rectified. Since the reinstatement of the
death penalty, 102 men and women have been released from Death
Row....some only minutes away from execution.
Race plays a role in the vast majority of
executions.
Race is an important factor in determining who is sentenced to die. In
1990 a report from the General Accounting Office concluded that "in 82
percent of the studies [reviewed], race of the victim was found to
influence the likelihood of being charged with capital murder or
receiving the death penalty, ie. those who murdered whites were more
likely to be sentenced to death than those who murdered blacks."
The death penalty is applied at random.
Politics, quality of legal counsel and the jurisdiction where a crime is
committed are more often the determining factors in a death penalty case
than the facts of the crime itself. The death penalty is a lethal
lottery: of the 22,000 homicides committed every year 300 people are
sentenced to death.
Capital punishment goes against almost every
religion.
Although isolated passages of the Bible have been quoted in support of
the death penalty, almost all religious groups in the United States
regard executions as immoral.
The USA is keeping company with notorious
human rights abusers.
The vast majority of countries in Western Europe, North America and
South America — more than 112 nations worldwide — have abandoned capital
punishment. The United States remains in the same company as Iraq, Iran
and China as one of the major advocates and users of capital punishment.
Executions are carried out at staggering cost
to taxpayers.
It costs more to execute a person than to keep him or her in prison for
life. A 1993 California study argues that each death penalty case costs
at least $1.25 million more than a regular murder case and a sentence of
life without possibility of parole.
Millions could be diverted to helping the
families of murder victims.
Families of murder victims undergo severe trauma and loss which no one
should minimize. However, executions do not help these people heal their
wounds nor do they end their pain; the extended process prior to
executions prolongs the agony of the family. Families of murder victims
would benefit far more if the funds now being used for the costly
process of executions were diverted to the provision of counseling and
other assistance.
There is a better alternative.
California judges have the option of sentencing convicted capital
murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole. There are
currently over 1,700 people in California who have received this
alternative sentence which includes a limited appeals process. According
to the Governor's Office, only one person sentenced to life without
parole has been released since the state provided for this option in
1977, and this occurred because he was able to prove his innocence.
Back to Criminal Justice
Committee Page |